发布时间：2006.7
摘要
Network Centric Warfare (NCW) is the new buzz phrase in the defence community. The U.S. in particular is spending billions of dollars to transform its military forces into strong, highly mobile networked units. Other countries throughout the world, including France, the U.K., Germany and Australia, are adopting similar doctrines of Network Based Operations (NBO) to update and transform their forces. Key to this doctrine are defence communications and information technology, which provide the infrastructure that make such networking possible.
Because of the tremendous size and complexity of this undertaking, however, there is increased potential for problems with speed, bandwidth, security and network organisation. Defence, I.T. and communications companies are working together to oversome these obstacles, and those that are successful could potentially see an enormous increase in revenue. This latest visiongain report will help you to confidently decide the right strategy for your company in this dynamic market.
What questions does the report answer?
Where is the market for NBO communications technology and how is it likely to develop?
What are the key drivers and restraints of NBO technology development?
What is the positioning of the main players?
Who are the front runners and main companies involved in developing NBO technology?
Where are the greatest opportunities to be found in this market?
Why should they buy the report?
Government defence ministries and departments and companies should buy this report because it:
Provides a central source of information on Network Based Operations (NBO) and battlefield communications technology
Delves in-depth into the main issues surrounding NBO and networking efforts
Examines the commitment by governments to battlefield digitisation
Provides information about networking efforts in all the major countries
Provides information about the latest contracts and project developments
Details the latest battlefield communications technology
目录及图表
1.0 Executive summary
1.1 Methodology
1.2 U.S. vs. European capabilities
1.3 Market forecasts and recommendations
1.4 Multinational networking efforts
1.5 The main players
1.6 The challenges of multinational interoperability
2.0 Introduction
Table 1: International networking doctrines
Chart 1: Top 10 defence spending nations, 2005
3.0 Key elements in NBO
3.1 Doctrine
3.2 C4ISTAR systems
3.2.1 C4ISTAR market overview
3.2.2 Command, control, communications, computers (C4)
3.2.2.1 Joint command-and-control (C2)
3.2.2.2 Satellite communications
3.2.2.3 Tactical communications
3.2.3 Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition, Reconnaissance (ISTAR)
3.2.3.1 Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles
3.2.3.2 Earth observation satellites
3.2.4 Some key technology challenges
4.0 Doctrines and programmes in key countries
4.1 The United States
Chart 2: U.S. defence spending, 2002-2009
Table 2: Key U.S. NCW programmes
4.1.1 The Network Centric Warfare (NCW) doctrine
4.1.2 Global Information Grid (GIG)
Figure 1: A characterisation of the GIG
4.1.2.1 Global Information Grid-Bandwidth Expansion (GIG-BE)
4.1.3 Warfighter Information Network - Tactical (WIN-T)
4.1.4 Joint Tactical Radio system (JTRS)
4.1.5 Future Combat Systems (FCS)
4.1.6 Military space programmes
Figure 2: U.S. government budget for space programmes, 2003-2007
4.1.6.1 Military satellite communications programmes
4.1.6.1.1 Advanced Extremely High Frequency (AEHF) system
4.1.6.1.2 Transformation Communications Satellite (TSAT) system
4.1.6.2 Military earth observation programmes
4.1.6.2.1 Space-Based Infrared System-High (SBIRS-High)
4.1.6.2.2 Future Imagery Architecture (FIA)
4.1.6.2.3 Space Radar programme
4.1.7 UAV and UCAV programmes
Table 3: U.S. DoD UAV R&D FY05-FY09
4.1.7.1 Navy and Marine Corps UAV programmes
4.1.7.2 Army UAV programmes
4.1.7.3 Air Force UAV programmes
4.1.7.3.1 Predator
4.1.7.3.2 Global Hawk
4.1.7.4 Joint Unmanned Combat Air Systems (J-UCAS)
4.2 European national doctrines and programmes
4.2.1 The United Kingdom
Chart 3: U.K. defence spending, 2002-2009
4.2.1.1 The Network Enabled Capabilities (NEC) doctrine
Table 4: Key U.K. NEC programmes
4.2.1.2 Defence Information Infrastructure (DII)
4.2.1.3 Bowman and the Battlefield Land Digitization (BLD) programme
4.2.1.4 Future Rapid Effect System (FRES)
4.2.1.5 Future Integrate Soldier Technology (FIST)
4.2.1.4 Skynet 4 and 5
4.2.1.5 Watchkeeper and the Joint Service UAV Experimentation Programme (JUEP)
4.2.1.6 Airborne Stand-Off Radar (ASTOR)
4.2.2 France
Chart 4: French defence spending, 2002-2009
4.2.2.1 The Network Centric Operations doctrine
Table 5: Key French ORC programmes
4.2.2.2 SICA
4.2.2.3 RITA-2000
4.2.2.4 Syracuse 3
4.2.2.5 Helios 1 and 2
Figure 3: National contributions to Helios 1 & 2 programmes
4.2.2.6 EuroMale and Neuron
4.2.2.7 Integrated Soldier Equipment and Communications (FELIN)
4.2.3 Sweden
4.2.3.1 The Network Based Defence (NBD) doctrine
Table 6: Key Swedish NBC programmes
4.2.3.2 ROLF 2010
4.2.3.3 RAKEL
4.2.4 Germany
Chart 5: German defence spending, 2002-2009
4.2.4.1 The Networked Operational Command (NetOpFü) doctrine
Table 7: Key German NetOpFü programmes
4.2.4.2 C2 System of the Armed Forces
4.2.4.3 BIGSTAF and MobKommSysBw
4.2.4.4 SAR-Lupe
4.2.4.5 Euro Hawk
4.3 Australia
Chart 6: Australian defence spending, 2002-2009
4.3.1 The Network Centric Warfare (NCW) doctrine
Table 8: Key Australian NCW programmes
4.3.2 Battlespace Communications System - Land
4.3.3 Military Satellite Communications
4.3.4 Defence Wide Area Communications Network
4.3.5 Space-based Surveillance Capability
5.0 Forecasts and recommendations
Chart 7: C4ISR company market share, 2006-2016
Chart 8: U.S. transformation spending levels, 2005-2009
5.1 The C4ISR market
5.2 The military satellite market
5.3 The UAV market
6.0 Multinational organisations: NATO and the EU
Figure 4: NATO Network Enabled Capability Focus Areas (Transfers of Authority)
6.1 NATO doctrine and programmes
6.1.1 The NATO Network Enabled Capability (NNEC) doctrine
Table 9: Key NATO programmes
6.1.2 Air Command and Control System (ACCS)
6.1.3 Alliance Ground Surveillance (AGS)
6.1.3.1 Programme development and evolution
6.1.3.2 Radar development
6.1.3.3 AGS programme outlook
6.2 European Union: network-based doctrine and programmes
6.2.1 EDA-EUMC C3 strategy
6.2.2 EDA Programmes on Long Endurance UAVs
6.2.2.1 Survivability technology
7.0 Key players in industry
7.1 U.S.
7.1.1 Lockheed Martin
7.1.2 Boeing
7.1.3 Northrop Grumman
7.1.4 General-Dynamics
7.1.5 Raytheon
7.2 Europe
7.2.1 EADS
7.2.2 BAE Systems
7.2.3 Thales
7.2.4 Rheinmetall Defence Electronics
7.2.5 Rhode and Schwarz
7.2.6 QinetiQ
7.2.7 Sagem
7.2.8 Saab-Ericsson
8.0 Coalition interoperability in NBO
8.1 Multinational forums addressing interoperability
Table 10: Multi-national interoperability forums
8.1.1 The Multinational Interoperability Council (MIC)
8.1.2 The Combined Communications-Electronics Board (CCEB)
8.1.3 The Multilateral Interoperability Programme (MIP)
8.1.4 The Combined Endeavour exercises
8.1.5 The Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium (NCOIC)
ADI Limited
Affiliated Computer Systems
Alcatel Space
Alenia Aeronautica
Anteon International Corporation
BAE Systems
Boeing
Bombardier
Conquest Inc.
Dassault Aviation
Digital Systems Resources
EADS
EADS Astrium
EADS CASA
EDS
Elbit Systems
Eltel Networks
ESPELSA
Fujitsu
Galileo Avionica
General Atomics
General Dynamics
General Motors
Harris Corporation
Hellenic Aerospace Industry
Houston Associates
Indra
Instrumentointi Oy
Israeli Aircraft Industries
JPS Communications
Leigh Aerospace
Lockheed Martin
Logica CMG
Nokia
Northrop Grumman
OHB Systems
ONERA
Orincon
Paradigm Secure Communications
Patria Oyj
Raytheon
Rockwell Collins
RUAG
Saab
SAGEM Défense Sécurité
Siemens Business Services
SNC Technologies
Solipsys
Telstra Defence
Tenix Defence
Tesat Spacecom
Thales
Titan Corporation
TNO
TRS (Thales Raytheon Systems)
TRW
Veridian